Puritan Rhetoric: The Issue of Emotion in Religion

Puritan Rhetoric: The Issue of Emotion in Religion

Puritan Rhetoric: The Issue of Emotion in Religion [Reading] ➾ Puritan Rhetoric: The Issue of Emotion in Religion Author Eugene E. White – Polishdarling.co.uk The nature of Puritanism in America and the role of emotion in religion is the subject of this important and useful collection of five religious orations, discussed and appraised by Professor White fo The nature of Puritanism in America and the The Issue PDF/EPUB è role of emotion in religion is the subject of this important and useful collection of five religious orations, discussed and appraised by Professor White for students of Puri tanism and rhetoric The five orations presented here consist of three by Jonathan Edwards, Future Punishment, Distinguishing Marks, and The Nature of the Affections one by Charles Chauncy, Enthusiasm Described and Caution d Against and one by Ebenezer Gay, Natural Religion, as Distinguished from Revealed In the first or introductory part of the book, Professor White dis cusses in considerable detail the Puritan Rhetoric: PDF \ broader implications of the confrontation between rationalists and revivalists in New England, represented by the following orations, during this most important upheaval in the Colonies prior to the Revolution The orations themselves are arranged to represent the force and counterforce of reason versus emotionalism and the precarious balance maintained momentarily and, eventually, lost And in the third part of the book Professor White provides critical analysis and suggested appraisal for further interpretation and inquiry.


3 thoughts on “Puritan Rhetoric: The Issue of Emotion in Religion

  1. Joshua Joshua says:

    The first third is an excellent history of Puritan preaching with an eye specifically toward the issue of emotion The second third is a sample of four sermons with the author s questions for stimulating analysis The third third is a rhetorical analysis of each of the sample sermons The second and third portions are nice pieces for high school and college undergraduates to gain exposure to the task of rhetorical criticism from a rhetorical history theoretical perspective The first third of The first third is an excellent history of Puritan preaching with an eye specifically toward the issue of emotion The second third is a sample of four sermons with the author s questions for stimulating analysis The third third is a rhetorical analysis of each of the sample sermons The second and third portions are nice pieces for high school and college undergraduates to gain exposure to the task of rhetorical criticism from a rhetorical history theoretical perspective The first third of the book is what shines the most, I think Dr White doesn t get the Puritan exactly right, but he does better than most, and has a good sense of how to do history with respect to those about whom one is writing, and with a careful qualification of one s own claims as an historian


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


3 thoughts on “Puritan Rhetoric: The Issue of Emotion in Religion

  1. Joshua Joshua says:

    The first third is an excellent history of Puritan preaching with an eye specifically toward the issue of emotion The second third is a sample of four sermons with the author s questions for stimulating analysis The third third is a rhetorical analysis of each of the sample sermons The second and third portions are nice pieces for high school and college undergraduates to gain exposure to the task of rhetorical criticism from a rhetorical history theoretical perspective The first third of The first third is an excellent history of Puritan preaching with an eye specifically toward the issue of emotion The second third is a sample of four sermons with the author s questions for stimulating analysis The third third is a rhetorical analysis of each of the sample sermons The second and third portions are nice pieces for high school and college undergraduates to gain exposure to the task of rhetorical criticism from a rhetorical history theoretical perspective The first third of the book is what shines the most, I think Dr White doesn t get the Puritan exactly right, but he does better than most, and has a good sense of how to do history with respect to those about whom one is writing, and with a careful qualification of one s own claims as an historian


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *